Saturday, 24 February 2018

week 8 Heirloom

 
Doris' gold locket brooch
 
This piece of jewellery was owned and worn by an ancestor Doris BIRD. Daughter of George BIRD and Sarah TIPTON, Doris was bornin 1898 at Derbyshire, England. Although nothing can be stated with confidence as to when or how the brooch was acquired by her, it is easy to follow its descent through the following four generations of one daughter families; Doris --> to her daughter Loraine --> to her neice Corrinne--> to her daughter Shannon.
The object is classed as a locket brooch. It measures 40mm long x22mm wide at extreme points and weighs 10 grams. It appears to be constructed from gold over an alloy with a nine carot gold centrepiece encasing a ruby and two seed pearls. On the front there is some decorative depth and relief work and a contrasting matt and shiny surface presentation. By removing the rear gold surround glass, two attachment screwsare visible. There is no visible manufacturers mark.     
 
 
           
Historically lockets have been worn for centuries. Originating in Europe in the 1500s they contained and/or concealed good luck charms, perfume soaked fabric to disguise and ward off  bad smalls, miniature portraits, at times poison[1].
 Elizabethans wore miniatures painted by the best artists of the times within their expensive lockets; only the well-to-do could afford them. Queen Elizabeth I wore a portrait of her mother Anne Boleyn and herself within a ring locket.
During the Victorian era Prince Albert presented Queen Victoria with an 8 locket bracelet, each containing an engraved name with date of birth, and lock of hair from one of their children. Upon Albert’s death, Victoria wore a photograph of him within a mourning locket. Thus a must-have fashion trend was set
[2].                                                                                       
   
 

              
The industrial revolution played a large part in jewellery becoming affordable and available to more people. The development of electric gold-plating used metal alloy in place of gold and silver, the creation of imitation stones, and production-line manufacturing all lowered costs. However, towards the end of the 19th century several other factors were coming into play regarding jewellery. William Morris was founder of a movement opposed to over mechanisation, and skilled artisans began rejecting machine-based factory systems. Focus returned to hand-crafted jewellery; imperfections were embraced as individual workmanship, the increased use of less precious metals and alloys, and gems chosen for colour as opposed to monetary value became fashionable
[3] .
                                       
                                                                                           
An interest in Egyptian and Greek jewellery styles was awoken aside the archaeological discoveries from these ancient civilizations. The grand period of 1860-1885 saw a revival of Greek and Etruscan techniques. Engraving[4] and chasing[5] were replaced with filigree[6] and granulation[7] to create depth and relief, with matt and glossy finishes[8].  The Late/Aesthetic Period, 1885-1901 also brought in a more subtle, unfussy style of jewellery better suited to the role women were taking up in society as they began participating in business, politics and sport[9].

 These photographs compare our example against two others of the late Victorian period.



Another reliable means to date brooch jewellery is to examine the catch, hinge and pin mechanism [10].
The ‘C’ catch, a simple bend in the fastener, was the earliest type in use from c1850-1910. Usually this fastening mechanism is handmade and without any safety features which were introduced c1890 onwards.

The pin can be dated by the diameter, thicker usually denotes an older mechanism, as the fabric it pinned to was generally a looser and heavier weave. More delicate synthetic fabrics of the 20th century required a finer pin. Usually handmade, the earlier pins also extended further beyond the c-catch, mid-19th century by
1/8 - ¼ inches.
The tube hinge was most commonly used between 1850 and 1910. Also handmade, typically by the person making the brooch, it consisted of three tubes in a T-shape attached to the brooch at two points and the pin at the third. Later a single pieced pin, catch and ‘round hinge‘ became most common.  
From these brooch decoration and fastener comparisons one can safely conclude this item was produced in the late Victorian era.

 
On 02 April 1911, Doris was staying at Aunt Annie’s home[11]. In October the same year she immigrated to New Zealand with her mother and sister[12] and never returned to England.
Was Doris’ locket a farewell gift?
  

[1] The secret life of Antiques: Lockets, http://www.theribboninmyjournal.com/the-secret-life-of-antiques-lockets/, Accessed 01 May 2017.Z
[2] The secret life of Antiques: Lockets. [3] The History Jewellery Part 2: From 19th Century to the Modern Day, http://mallams.co.uk/news/history-jewellery-part-2-19th-century-modern-day/, Accessed 01 May 2017.[4] cut design[5] indenting[6] fine soldered wires[7] adherence of small gold beads using heat as opposed to solder[8] Grand Period 1860-1885, http://www.langantiques.com/university/Grand_Period_1860-1885, Accessed 01 May 2017.[9] Influence of the Victorian Era on Jewellery Makers, http://www.cooksongold.com/blog/trends-and-inspiration/cooksongold-blogger-jo-varney-looks-at-the-victoria-era, Accessed 01 May 2017.[10] Dating Brooch Fasteners 1850-1910, https://www.realorrepro.com/article/Dating-brooch-fasteners, Accessed 01 May 2017.[11] Ancestry, 1911 England Census for Doris Bird,   Ancestry.com., 1911 England Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. Original data: Census Returns of England and Wales, 1911. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the UK (TNA), 1911.[12] Find My Past, Travel and Migration for Doris Bird, Findmypast.com., Passenger Lists Leaving UK 1890-1960 Transcription [database on-line].[13]Cleaning and Caring for Vintage Pearl Jewellery, http://www.ebay.com.au/gds/Cleaning-and-Caring-for-Vintage-Pearl-Jewelry-/10000000177633040/g.html, Accessed 01 May 2017.
 
 




Tuesday, 20 February 2018

week 7: Valentine

At this point I have exhausted all possible avenues of thought to produce an article with this prompt.

Friday, 9 February 2018

Week 6: Favourite name



As the name of a country, IRELAND or EIRE is my favourite.

I never really understood why I felt my closest attachment to this country; the brogue, the music, the people, the history and the heritage, the cities and countryside... just everything... but from an early age it just felt right.

Paper-tracing my ethnic heritage back to the nationalities of the New Zealand settlers showed a majority of ancestors from the UK, 10/16 of my 2x great-grandparents. Twice as many as my 5/16 Irish ancestors, so why?

 

Mid last year I had my DNA tested by ancestry.com and by studying my ethnicity, it looks to have answered my question...

 
It shows 47% of my ethnicity originating in Ireland/Scotland/Wales, and only 3% from Great Britain (a low confidence region). I believe 2/16 of my 2x great-grandparents do come from Scotland (although this has still to be confirmed) which often shared ancestral heritage with Eire through migration. No known ancestry from Wales at this date.
 
Ireland consists of 4 provinces:

Munster is made up of, Clare, Cork, Kerry, Limerick, Tipperary, Waterford. The main city is Cork.
Connaught - is made up of Galway, Leitrim, Mayo, Roscommon, Sligo. The main city is Galway.
Leinster is made up of Carlow, Dublin, Kildare, Kilkenny, Laois, Longford, Louth, Meath, Offaly,
              Westmeath, Wexford, Wicklow. The main city is Dublin.
Ulster is mostly part of the UK.  

 
I have been able to attribute some of my ancestry to Munster (as per ancestry assessment) but Connaught appears to figure prominantly, and possibly Leinster.
Irish ancestry place of origin (left to right and top to bottom):
            Patrick O'MALLEY- Corofin, County Clare, MUNSTER
            Eileen SHERIDAN- some mystery. Oral history suggests Eileen was born at the Dublin Police Barracks. LEINSTER.
           Mary Jane ANNETT- some mystery. It is possible MJ was born in Dublin, LEINSTER prior to her mother meeting
                                            William  ANNETT (1841 census for MJ/1851 census for her mother Mary ).
           Michael MEALLY/O'MALLEY - Corofin, County Clare, MUNSTER.
           Margaret FLANAGAN - Kilfenora, County Clare, MUNSTER.
           Terence SHERIDAN - some mystery, maybe Old Castle, Meath, and Dublin, LEINSTER.
           Mary Anne MANNING - Achil Island, County Mayo, CONNAUGHT.
           MANNING and MULLENS links are ties to Kilronan, Aran Isles and Achil Is, CONNAUGHT.

So yes, questions answered but more questions to ask also... did my british ancetors originate in Ireland before settling in England pre1800? How does ancestry access and attribute its ethnicities? 

Saturday, 3 February 2018

Week 5: In the Census

For over 30 years the BIRD flight from England to New Zealand was a mystery to me. All we knew was Beatrice was a minor, but I couldn’t for the life of me find when or on which ship  the family voyage took place.  It seemed ridiculous that it was so difficult to solve, after all it was my mother’s mother... such a close family link!

We knew it happened because George, Sarah and Doris were recorded in the 1901 UK census https://www.ancestry.com.au/sharing/12604691?h=2de17a&utm_campaign=bandido-webparts&utm_source=post-share-modal&utm_medium=share-url ... and then they were definitely here in New Zealand.

The breakthrough came when I found separate census entries  for Sarah & Beatrice (staying with Sarah’s sister Maria RILEY), and Doris (staying with George’s sister Annie BARTON). All 3 were noted as visitors....




 ...but where was George? And why were the daughters separated?
An aproximate  starting date, a bit of lateral thinking, a free weekend to view immigration indexes on Findmypast’, and 100 years since his departure to the day,  I located George. He had emigrated to New Zealand aboard the 'IONIC',  listed as a single man, departing  London, UK on  11 Nov 1910 and arriving in Wellington, NZ on 29 December 1910.
From there it was easy to locate Sarah and the girls. Eleven months later  they set sail for New Zealand aboard the
'SS TONGARIRO', departing London on 20 October 1911 and arriving in Wellington  09 December  2011.




Sadly they had to say goodbye to a a third daughter  left behind in England;
 
 https://corrinne-kiwicolleen.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/rose-elizabeth-bird-1892-1896.html